Springfield, MO

Log in Subscribe

Opinion: Saving America’s wildlife a bipartisan issue

Posted online

Editor's Note: This opinion piece by U.S. Sens. Roy Blunt, R-Missouri, and Martin Heinrich, D-New Mexico, first ran at

At a time when it has become difficult to find many areas of agreement in Washington, the outdoors has proven to be a real uniting force.

The two of us were proud to help lead the bipartisan effort last year to pass the historic Great American Outdoors Act into law, which is already helping us tackle the longstanding infrastructure backlog at our national parks and public lands. We are now teaming up to make similar historic progress on species recovery and wildlife habitat.

The abundance of many species that we hunt and fish today is the direct result of collaborative work financed by bedrock conservation laws like Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson. Yet despite the incredible successes of these programs – particularly with game species like elk and mule deer in New Mexico and sportfish like black bass in Missouri – and the wins brought on by the Endangered Species Act in preventing hundreds of species from going extinct, it’s been clear for decades that thousands of species of plants and animals are still declining or even heading towards extinction.

Without enough resources, state and Tribal wildlife agencies have been forced to pick and choose which species are worth saving. Instead of doing the proactive work that is necessary to maintain healthy wildlife populations on the front end, they have been forced into using reactive, "emergency room" measures to rescue species after they are listed as threatened or endangered.

We urgently need to change this paradigm and save thousands of species with a solution that matches the magnitude of the challenge. Our bill, the Recovering America’s Wildlife Act, offers us a constructive path forward.

This legislation would be the most significant investment in wildlife conservation in a generation – it would fund proactive, voluntary conservation efforts to address the nation’s wildlife crisis. These efforts could and often would include partnerships with private landowners.

The Recovering America’s Wildlife Act establishes a new program, the Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program, within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to promote voluntary conservation efforts to restore and protect at-risk, threatened or endangered species. This new program would provide approximately $1.3 billion annually to states, U.S. territories and Tribes for activities related to proactive and collaborative habitat restoration efforts to increase wildlife populations and prevent species from ever needing to be listed under the Endangered Species Act.

These projects will create substantial economic benefits, including good-paying jobs in rural communities. They will preserve outdoor recreation activities like hunting, fishing and wildlife viewing that support millions of additional jobs all across our country. And they will help us restore healthy habitat for the more than 12,000 species in our country that are currently identified as species of greatest conservation need.

The numbers of wildlife currently facing down threats can be daunting. But just think how dire things must have seemed many decades ago when sportsmen came together to establish a tax on themselves and to voluntarily limit harvest in order to recover the game they loved to hunt. We should follow their example if we want to successfully recover healthy populations of wildlife species – from bobwhite quail and meadowlarks in Missouri to Gila trout and Southwestern willow flycatchers in New Mexico.

If we can pass the Recovering America’s Wildlife Act into law, our grandchildren will be able to experience the same rich and abundant American wildlife – from bumblebees to bison – that we have been so lucky to grow up with. We will pass on the full complement of our natural heritage as well as traditions like hunting, fishing and wildlife viewing to future Americans. We hope all of our colleagues and our constituents will join us in backing this effort to pay it forward.

Sen. Roy Blunt represents Missouri as a Republican, and Sen. Martin Heinrich is a Democrat from New Mexico.


No comments on this story |
Please log in to add your comment
Editors' Pick
Open for Business: Mercy Clinic Family Medicine – South Creek

Mercy Springfield Communities relocated a clinic; San Clemente, California-based law firm Gilson Daub Inc. expanded to the Springfield market; and a second video gaming center for Contender eSports Springfield LLC opened in the Queen City.

Most Read
Update cookies preferences